TSLF: Success
Dealers will get fat on that one.
Cover was 1.15 [the lower the better]
Stop out: 0.33 [as above]
0.33 is the difference between 2 repo rates, good treasury collateral and junk fed to the Fed.
Overnight the spread is over 1.00
Dealers will get fat on that one.
Cover was 1.15 [the lower the better]
Stop out: 0.33 [as above]
0.33 is the difference between 2 repo rates, good treasury collateral and junk fed to the Fed.
Overnight the spread is over 1.00
This CDS report was written by Markit's Gavan Nolan Investment grade European credit was resilient today in the face of declining stock markets. The strong performance in financials continued, with yet another bank providing a positive surprise. Credit Suisse posted ...
Unfortunately, there will be a brief delay in service while I dry off my undergarments and descend into the plateaued euphoria of the newly minted Icahn Report.
It’s a cliché that people adapt. This new paper shed interesting light upon this. It finds that people do indeed fully adapt to both marriage and the birth of a child. They get happier as these events draw nearer, but...
A noted manager of financial sector funds finds little to like out there. (WSJ.com) Goldman Sachs (GS) raises $10 billion to invest in loans backing LBOs. (FT Alphaville also Deal Journal) The Mexican Peso is at a ...
freeze a Yankee.” That’s what bumper stickers said in the 1970s. But now, the upper hand is on the other foot. No Tags
Just in time to avoid the aftermath of the dreadful Merrill results, I'm off on holiday. (Although it's worth noting that the shares "sinking" 9% in after-hours trade only brings them back to where they closed yesterday.) There won't be ...
Ainsi donc la loi sur les nouveaux devoirs des chômeurs a été adoptée. Désormais, les allocations chômage seront dégressives en cas de refus de deux offres "raisonnables". Mais à quoi cela peut-il bien servir?
contact
jck [at]
aleablog [dot] com
© 2008 Alea | Powered by Wordpress
March 27th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
We can win any game where we get to define the victory condition.
Seriously, the 1.15x bid-to-cover was weaker than I would have expected. They only received $86 billion in bids to swap Agency RMBS collateral for Treasury collateral? Maybe I am missing something, but given the low bid-to-cover and being so near the 25 bp minimum, that auction came close to failing.
March 27th, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Then again, if I wanted to get some mortgage collateral off my books over the quarter-end, 33 bp seems like a nice spread to pay…
March 27th, 2008 at 2:21 pm
David:
The best outcome would have been if nobody showed up. It would have shown that dealers have no problem financing schedule 2 collateral. Given that the overnight spread is well over 100 bp and 14 day term around 75 bp, this is a “good” result.
By the way nothing goes off the book, just like a repo, the assets remain on the balance sheet of the dealers.
March 27th, 2008 at 3:19 pm
I get it. Thanks, jck.
March 27th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
perhaps the dealers had no mbs to repo to the FED as all has been hocked already
March 27th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
barry:
actually, the “fails” problem is now happening in the mbs market. more fails in mbs than treasuries, unheard of.
http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/statistics/deal.pdf
March 27th, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Prior to today’s TSLF od $75 billion, in the last 10 days the Fed did:
* a $50 billion TAF auction on Monday. Also did a $50 billion TAF on March 10.
* Disscount window borrowings set another ALL-TIME record this week averaging $33 billion, this week with $37 billion yesterday alone. The old record was $12 billion the weel of 9/20/01.
* Sold $47 billion of Treasuries this week ($40 billion in bills and $7 billion in notes and bonds). This is anlso a world record, breaking the old record of $40 billion set last week
* Also keep in mind that Bear Stearns is probably not playing as the Fed gave Morgan $30 billion special for them, of which they have drawn on $5.5 billion.
So, remind me again why $86 billion is bids means the situation is stabilzing? Prior to today’s auction, the Fed has already supplied $215 billion in liquidity in just the last few days and yet te street had a need to ask for $86 billion more.
Silly me, I would think that the street needing $300+ billion in liqudity since march 10 would be a sign of trouble, not that things are getting better.
March 27th, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Markit:
I am absolutely not saying that we are out of the woods, just that the TSLF, so far appears to have done the job of capping the spread beteween treasury collateral and mbs with a lot of help from the other “facilities.”
I am waiting for an answer as to how the Fed accounts for the JPM “facility.” It was supposed to be under “other credit extensions” but this is down to 0 as of last night so it’s somewhere else, maybe off balance sheet.
March 29th, 2008 at 4:58 am
jck,
Just a quick note regarding the JPM facility (your comment #8). There are (or were) in fact three such facilities:
(1) the March 14 facility, which predates the original merger agreement between JPM and Bear;
(2) the March 16 facility, which supplements the original merger agreement; and
(3) the USD29bn term financing facility, which was agreed last weekend in connection with the amended merger agreement.
As you say, facilities (1) and (2) appear under “Other credit extensions”; cf. the introduction to the H.4.1 release of March 20, 2008. This release shows that utilization of these facilities had dropped to zero on March 19 - presumably because, by then, Bear could access the Primary dealer credit facility, which became operative on March 17. The current H.4.1 shows that utilization has remained at zero since then.
The 29 billion facility doesn’t appear on the Fed balance sheet yet, because it will be provided “[a]t the closing of the merger,” (http://www.ny.frb.org/newsevents/news/markets/2008/rp080324.html). I guess that means that it is completely off-balance for the time being.
March 29th, 2008 at 5:58 am
jck,
“maybe off balance sheet”.
Now the Fed runs SIV’s! That’s progress.
March 30th, 2008 at 10:25 am
Cahagnes:
Thx for the details. I suspect the loan is under the PDCF for now but it would be a good idea for the Fed to clarify that. The market is under the impression that the PDCF is used by other parties than Bear.
March 31st, 2008 at 7:58 am
jck,
I’m not sure which loan you are referring to in your post #11, but to clarify my previous post (#9): if you take the NY Fed statement and H.4.1 releases at face value, there were no special Fed loans to Bear at any time between March 19 and March 26 (both dates inclusive). Of course, it may very well be the case that Bear was among the Primary Dealers that were borrowing (overnight) under the PDCF at some time during that period, but that wouldn’t constitute a loan under any of the special facilities (1) – (3).
March 31st, 2008 at 10:11 am
Cahagnes:
There will be a loan of $30 bn against some Bear assets when the JPM/BS merger closes. In the meantime some small amount was drawn at the discount window ($5.5 bn) under a new “other credit extensions” during the week ending march19th, the Fed said:”This category includes credit extensions such as the arrangements involving JPMorgan Chase & Co. and The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. that were approved by the Board of Governors on March 14, 2008, and March 16, 2008.” That line went to 0 on march20th while the PDCF that day went up to $28.8 bn. We can speculate that the loan went under the PDCF on march20th and later, but I would prefer not to have to speculate and that the Fed explains clearly what’s up.
March 31st, 2008 at 10:23 am
correction: the loan at the merger close is $29 bn…amazingly close to the PDCF outstanding balance on march 20th.
April 2nd, 2008 at 4:57 pm
[...] billion U.S. Treasurys will mature and leave the market. Note: this is twice the size of the successful TSLF auction last Friday. However, there can be more TSLF auctions in the future. The total size of the program [...]
April 10th, 2008 at 2:52 pm
[...] at the minimum spread of 25 bp. For the TSLF, success means low bidding or no bidding. Related: TSLF: Success [...]