<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The World’s Safest Sovereign Debt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/</link>
	<description>Alea Jacta Est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amateur?</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t done this stuff but I would look first a state&#039;s ability to collect further income when needed. The USA can print more money if they are not afraid of inflation. Norway can sell more oil, which doesn&#039;t cause inflation. Oil is thus better than a printing machine. 

Australians already have some private debt which limits government&#039;s ability to increase taxes, if a financial meltdown hits it. Current account is negative. It is an exporter of commodities (but not oil), thus a global meltdown would hit her hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t done this stuff but I would look first a state&#8217;s ability to collect further income when needed. The USA can print more money if they are not afraid of inflation. Norway can sell more oil, which doesn&#8217;t cause inflation. Oil is thus better than a printing machine. </p>
<p>Australians already have some private debt which limits government&#8217;s ability to increase taxes, if a financial meltdown hits it. Current account is negative. It is an exporter of commodities (but not oil), thus a global meltdown would hit her hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>-jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>I am also very surprised at the Aussie position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also very surprised at the Aussie position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve L</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2764</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2764</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  14th surprises me for a nation with a pre-funded retirement system, natural wealth in commodities, easily defensible borders and a relatively corruption-free legal system - but I&#039;m too enamored with my book, I guess.  Still, the same as the UK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  14th surprises me for a nation with a pre-funded retirement system, natural wealth in commodities, easily defensible borders and a relatively corruption-free legal system &#8211; but I&#8217;m too enamored with my book, I guess.  Still, the same as the UK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>-jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>Australia is at 14th, same rating as the UK
No CDS market for Canada for now, so no implied rating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia is at 14th, same rating as the UK<br />
No CDS market for Canada for now, so no implied rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve L</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>Ouch!  Where&#039;d Australia and Canada come out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch!  Where&#8217;d Australia and Canada come out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>-jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>If we were to go only by the hazard rate that&#039;s definitely not AAA, clear, but implied ratings should be derived from  expected losses, not just hazard rates, so with a high recovery rate it could be AAA. 
this is a CMA proprietary model, so I don&#039;t know exactly how the rating is derived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we were to go only by the hazard rate that&#8217;s definitely not AAA, clear, but implied ratings should be derived from  expected losses, not just hazard rates, so with a high recovery rate it could be AAA.<br />
this is a CMA proprietary model, so I don&#8217;t know exactly how the rating is derived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahalanobis</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahalanobis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2757</guid>
		<description>So how does this then justify a AAA rating? Higher recovery rate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how does this then justify a AAA rating? Higher recovery rate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>-jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>Yep, they are in %, i.e the probability of sovereign default occurring at any time over a 5 year period. 
NOT an annual hazard rate, that would be around 1.1% for the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, they are in %, i.e the probability of sovereign default occurring at any time over a 5 year period.<br />
NOT an annual hazard rate, that would be around 1.1% for the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahalanobis</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahalanobis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>Are you sure CPDs are stated in per cent (way too high) and not in bps (bit low?)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure CPDs are stated in per cent (way too high) and not in bps (bit low?)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-world%e2%80%99s-safest-sovereign-debt/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>-jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=2984#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>the UK is 13th, implied rating AA+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the UK is 13th, implied rating AA+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
