Paper by Gauti Eggertsson
Abstract:
This paper proposes a new paradox: the paradox of toil. Suppose everyone wakes up one day and decides they want to work more. What happens to aggregate employment? This paper shows that, under certain conditions, aggregate employment falls; that is, there is less work in the aggregate because everyone wants to work more. The conditions for the paradox to apply are that the short-term nominal interest rate is zero and there are deflationary pressures and output contraction, much as during the Great Depression in the United States and, perhaps, the 2008 financial crisis in large parts of the world. The paradox of toil is tightly connected to the Keynesian idea of the paradox of thrift. Both are examples of a fallacy of composition.
no idea, it is an unusual pattern…
JCK, I have a question related to GLD/GC options Implied Volatility. This IV rises with the farther expirations while, say for SPY is stays about the same.
For instance:
GLD August options: IV is about 18
GLD Jan’11 options: IV is about 22.3
GLD Jan’12 options: IV is about 27.4
SPY August options: IV is about 23
SPY Dec’10 options: IV is about 25
SPY Dec’11 options: IV is about 25
Any thoughts? TIA, Ilya
In a non-Marxian world, Gregor’s comment would read “I do not like green eggs and ham”.
I commented on this paper before. Point 3 of this piece:
http://alephblog.com/2010/03/04/notes-and-comments-2/
In a non-Orwellian world, the abstract would read: “This paper utilizes a silly hypothesis to prove a lie.”