<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report on Special Purpose Entities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aleablog.com/report-on-special-purpose-entities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aleablog.com/report-on-special-purpose-entities/</link>
	<description>Alea Jacta Est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/report-on-special-purpose-entities/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4257#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>Not really comparable. CDO^2 are a small subset of CDOs and I don&#039;t think SIFMA disaggregate the structured finance data to that level of granularity (but not sure, would need to check).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really comparable. CDO^2 are a small subset of CDOs and I don&#8217;t think SIFMA disaggregate the structured finance data to that level of granularity (but not sure, would need to check).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acc</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/report-on-special-purpose-entities/#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>acc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4257#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>Hi jck,

Thank you for this link.  I&#039;m curious: Do you think that the SIFMA data on CDOs with structured finance collateral are roughly comparable to the BIS data (App. 4) on CDO^2 (which includes ABS CDO) with the exception that the latter includes unfunded tranches and the former does not?  Or are these data series not really comparable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi jck,</p>
<p>Thank you for this link.  I&#8217;m curious: Do you think that the SIFMA data on CDOs with structured finance collateral are roughly comparable to the BIS data (App. 4) on CDO^2 (which includes ABS CDO) with the exception that the latter includes unfunded tranches and the former does not?  Or are these data series not really comparable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
