Banks will have to show they don’t need the FDIC guarantee to issue debt, such as by raising it without the guarantee.
- DTCC Posts 6-Month Market Activity Snapshot on CDS Market
- Default in Today’s Advanced Economies: Unnecessary, Undesirable, and Unlikely
- The Impact of Banks’ Cumulative Reserve Position on Federal Funds Rate Behavior
- A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing
- TBA Trading and Liquidity in the Agency MBS Market
- Impact of High and Growing Government Debt on Economic Growth
- Financial Amplification of Foreign Exchange Risk Premia
- The Central-Bank Balance Sheet as an Instrument of Monetary Policy
- Exorbitant Privilege and Exorbitant Duty
- The Information Value of the Stress Test and Bank Opacity
- Price of Risk—Recent Evidence from Large Financials
- Shadow Banking
- Summer Doldrums
- Credit Default Swaps: What Are the Social Benefits and Costs?
- The International Role of the Euro
- Chronicle of Currency Collapses: Re-Examining the Effects on Output
- The Paradox of Toil
- Links
- What the Fed Did and Why
- Markets and Government Before, During and After the 2007-20xx Crisis
- Detecting and Interpreting Financial Stress in the Euro Area
- Are We Building the Foundations for the Next Crisis Already? The Case of Central Clearing
- Links
- Links
- OIS Discounting
- Multimarket Trading and the Cost of Debt: Evidence from Global Bonds
- Is Economics Coursework, or Majoring in Economics, Associated with Different Civic Behaviors?
- China’s High Saving Rate: Myth and Reality
- Oil Spill
- Eurozone €440 Bln SPV Aid Fund
- ECB Financial Accounts and ECB Financial Strength
- Central Bank Swap Networks
- DTCC Posts CDS Market Activity Snapshot
- ECB: Financial Stability Review (June 2010)
- Global CDO Issuance by Transaction Structure
- Links
- TBAC Minutes: Sovereign CDS and Swap Spreads
- Goldman Sachs Underwriting Market Shares in Subprime RMBS and CDOs
- Abacus for Dummies
- The World’s Safest and Riskiest Sovereign Debt (Update)
- Increased Sovereign Risk Behind Negative Swap Spreads
- Haircuts
- Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment
- Beyond the Dollar: Rethinking the International Monetary System
- Links
- Amazing Discovery
- ABCP Outstanding: Still Crashing
- Greek Government Bond Market
- Links
- Sterling Today
There are various reports that BAC and C have been hoovering-up distressed assets, for example http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/18599/C,+BAC+Pushing+Prices+Up%3F.
The talk about banks taking bets on distressed assets is non-sense, it would increase their risk-weights balance just as they have to do exactly the reverse. Watch the end of quarter and t-bills going to zero or negative, that tells you that they are doing the japan banks trick, out of high risk-weight, i.e. junk and into low risk-weight, i.e. t-bills, short treasuries.
Don’t agree. In view of reports that some banks are using TARP money to take bets on distressed assets or otherwise going on a gambling spree, I can perfectly well understand the Treasury putting in this kind of restriction.
This is not to say that I approve of the overall approach the US Treasury has taken, but in the context of the current policy the restriction makes political sense (economics went out the window long ago, not just in the US BTW).
Changing the rules repeatedly doesn’t seem reasonable to me. They have done it before with Tier 1 made obsolete in favor of TCE. TARP money already makes it difficult to raise equity because of potential dilution a bit like a death spiral convert.
Seems reasonable. Why should they cut the banks any slack while the need a crutch from FDIC?