As the slow-motion train wreck which was Lehman Brothers unfolds once more before our eyes, if not in the pages of our mainstream media—who continue to proclaim against all available ... [Link]
Chers lecteurs, mon temps et mon énergie sont comptés et j'ai envie de parler de trois sujets, mais ne peut dans l'immédiat en traiter qu'un. Quelles sont vos préférences? J'hésite ... [Link]
Unlike most people who analyze investments, I think there are periods of time where domestic long-only investors may be consigned to low or even negative returns. As investors, we are ... [Link]
Whether you are a trader or an investor you need to have a method and to follow it in a disciplined fashion. You also need to understand your system, having ... [Link]
The Bank of England does it. The Bank of Japan does it. So why can’t the Fed do it? Ben Bernanke spent the afternoon arguing before a House committee that ... [Link]
contact
jck [at]
aleablog [dot] com
© 2010 Alea | Powered by Wordpress
June 11th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
The big boys are mostly pissed that they didn’t think of it themselves, right? Don’t they get the same 10c/$ that they expected from buying insurance at 90c/$. They missed a creative exit strategy and someone profited in a big way off of them, and ‘it wasn’t nice’.
Am I missing some part of the mechanism that hurt the banks more than they first expected?
June 11th, 2009 at 4:46 pm
The big boys didn’t read the prospectus and got taken by someone who did. That’s all there is to it. They have no excuses and no ground for complaints, imho.
June 11th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
ROFLOL
June 11th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
JPM and RBS traders were unaware of cleanup call provisions? Wow.
June 11th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
Nominate Amherst for the investing Oscar “For most creative use of a cleanup call.” Way cool, and makes the pricing of CDS on securities with cleanup calls much more complex.
June 11th, 2009 at 9:35 pm
Hiring Laurie Goodman was a clever move, former UBS and author of my favorite books on everything CDOs and Subprime mortgages.
June 11th, 2009 at 11:45 pm
Just in case no one has a subscription to WSJ, here is a synopsis at http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/11/amhersts-cds-coup/
This is the hilarious slap-in-the-face that I have been waiting for (and from a small shop out of Texas! who woulda thunk!)
June 12th, 2009 at 6:56 am
It’s about time.
It was obvious that there was a problem when the notional value of default swaps exceeded the referenced security.
In the insurance business, they have had centuries to figure out that it is important to have an insurable interest to prevent abuses. For example, buying life insurance on someone else, or fire insurance on someone else’s house.