Read This

A Daring Trade Has Wall Street Seething

This entry was posted in 1. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Read This

  1. CapVandal says:

    It’s about time.

    It was obvious that there was a problem when the notional value of default swaps exceeded the referenced security.

    In the insurance business, they have had centuries to figure out that it is important to have an insurable interest to prevent abuses. For example, buying life insurance on someone else, or fire insurance on someone else’s house.

  2. Joe Hill says:

    Just in case no one has a subscription to WSJ, here is a synopsis at http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/06/11/amhersts-cds-coup/
    This is the hilarious slap-in-the-face that I have been waiting for (and from a small shop out of Texas! who woulda thunk!)

  3. jck says:

    Hiring Laurie Goodman was a clever move, former UBS and author of my favorite books on everything CDOs and Subprime mortgages.

  4. David Merkel says:

    Nominate Amherst for the investing Oscar “For most creative use of a cleanup call.” Way cool, and makes the pricing of CDS on securities with cleanup calls much more complex.

  5. Matt Swanholm says:

    JPM and RBS traders were unaware of cleanup call provisions? Wow.

  6. acc says:

    ROFLOL

  7. jck says:

    The big boys didn’t read the prospectus and got taken by someone who did. That’s all there is to it. They have no excuses and no ground for complaints, imho.

  8. Keith Wright says:

    The big boys are mostly pissed that they didn’t think of it themselves, right? Don’t they get the same 10c/$ that they expected from buying insurance at 90c/$. They missed a creative exit strategy and someone profited in a big way off of them, and ‘it wasn’t nice’.

    Am I missing some part of the mechanism that hurt the banks more than they first expected?