<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aleablog.com/rats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aleablog.com/rats/</link>
	<description>Alea Jacta Est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/rats/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=3798#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that simply stereotypical risk avoidance? Large punishments carry more pain that large rewards offer pleasure. The odds could be 50/50 but losing/winning 10 at a time is much scarier than winning/losing 1. That doesn&#039;t make choosing a less risky strategy &quot;optimal&quot; or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that simply stereotypical risk avoidance? Large punishments carry more pain that large rewards offer pleasure. The odds could be 50/50 but losing/winning 10 at a time is much scarier than winning/losing 1. That doesn&#8217;t make choosing a less risky strategy &#8220;optimal&#8221; or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
