Yep they are back, negative repo rates on T-bills. We have seen negative repo rates before on [ possibly squeezed ] notes and treasuries but I don’t recall ever seeing that on T-bills.
Quote 3 month T-bill repo: -0.20% also 4 year notes around -0.25%
Thanks to Stan J.
Related:
Repurchase Agreements with Negative Interest Rates
Contrary to popular belief, interest rates can drop below zero….
Un débat intéressant se lance sur le localisme universitaire, avec de vrais morceaux d'économistes dedans. Le localisme est, rappelons-le, cette pratique consistant à favoriser pour le recrutement des enseignants des "locaux" au détriment de candidats venus de l'extérieur. Le débat a été lancé par O. Godechot et A. Louvet sur la vie des idées, qui ...
On FT Alphaville this week, - On Monday, a week of banking succour: kicked off by HSBC. - Shrunken Crock. - On Tuesday, Barcap raids ABN. - Barclays updates its numbers. - Is this global inflation thing overcooked? - HMG Cassandras. - On Wednesday, Surallun meets the MPC: Yer Fiyud! - Bradford,...
It is appropriate, I suspect, for my first post over here – and I want to reiterate my thanks to Nouriel for hosting my blog at RGE for the past 8 months even I after I moved to the Council – is on the latest Treasury capital flows data. The TIC data is both amazing ...
Abnormal Returns is going to be taking a short break from blogging. During an earlier break we wrote this post highlighting some additional linkfests worth your time. In the meantime, feel free to drop us a line with any questions and/or comments. Will be back to our regular posting schedule as soon as possible. ...
GE looks as though it'll sell off its appliances business, and John Gapper wonders why GE is not prepared to invest enough in the business to turn it into a global powerhouse when it clearly expects someone else to buy it for that reason. I think the answer is the same as the reason why CBS ...
In his new book, Reappraisals, Tony Judt claims we live in an "age of forgetting". We regard history, he says, not as something that has shaped us, but rather a litany of error and delusion from which we have escaped...
Mark Thoma offers a very thoughtful rejoinder to my post on whether the Fed should be given authority to pay interest on deposits. Mark's comments range from specific,...
As a resident of New York City, I am acutely aware of the perils of neuroticism. This town is full of it. I am as guilty as anyone, although I try to keep it under wraps. If I wasn't concerned about looking like a control freak in front of clients and friends, I would grill ...
Developments in housing remain crucial for the economy and for stocks. Nearly any account of the housing situation includes reports of the number of foreclosures, the inventory of empty homes, and the potential ARM re-sets that may stimulate even more foreclosure activity. Any help for distressed homeowners would help to shift the supply curve for ...
A Berliner There is no truth to the old claim that when John F. Kennedy said, “Ich bin ein Berliner” — as opposed to “Ich bin Berliner” — he described himself as a pastry. But the story has truthiness, so it persists. Besides, when I was in 8th grade a German woman really did tell ...
Finishing off the average 10, the slightly better 5… Deltic Timber Deltic Timber was an idea that I gleaned from Jim Grant. They have a lot of timberland in the Southern US, a decent amount of which is next to Little Rock, Arkansas. The land near Little Rock, once developed, could be quite valuable in ...
contact
jck [at]
aleablog [dot] com
© 2008 Alea | Powered by Wordpress
March 20th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Thanks. Fascinating, and likely correlated with the fails.
March 24th, 2008 at 1:45 am
Essentially it may depend on initiating counterparty. The cash loan interest accrual - treasury accrual = fee for a repo. Now, cash is the king! It is safest! So cash loan (unsecured) should be higher. So repo fee is always +ve.
The -ve repo seems to be absurd as it brings about the conjecture that cash holding risk is (say) +ve, and treasury holding risk is 0! Oops 1! Also, from here we may infer (if we dont know cash is cash and treasury is treasury, if they are merely A and B) treasury is more liquid than cash! Oops 2!
Now let’s think about who is interested party between Fed and Banks-consortium. Looks like Fed is overly interested in Open market operation. So they need treasuries badly than cash. They want to give away cash in return of Treasuries….economic “crowding-in” as opposed to “crowding-out”…. increase money suppy and reduce treasury bond supply … and Fed is so eager to that for a period of three months, that it set the T-Bill repo -ve.
March 24th, 2008 at 3:44 pm
SOMETIMES WRONG BUT NEVER IN DOUBT?
As always confusion reigns when one talks about things that are not defined… and worse when one as Nath above… is not aware that is not aware..
Its a tough world in which Cash is not defined but c’est la vie…
Cash? Cash where? Cash left with whom?
Negative repos’s and their concomittant Prompt Delivery Repo.. i.e you have 5 minutes to delivery the bond or the trade is mutually broken… became a part of the goverment marketplace as a result of the CBOT Delivery squeeze ..
But that incident… funny didn’t provoke a major upset then… brings up the key point..
In trading Government securities.. cash.. is merely an accounting item.. the other side of the “repo”…
If i do a repo with some one.. he gives me cash… i give him a security.. the transactions is really a forward ….i give him cash today.. and he promises to give me the cash back tomorrow if I give him back the Bond…
The rates of interest as always in a repo/reverse repo has little or nothing to do with the risk free rate.. but is merely the credit spread.. or the scarcity premium for the particular asset.
Like the movie Casablanc.. people seem to be shocked that Repo rates are negative… but for years have seen nothing wrong with them being zero…?
March 24th, 2008 at 4:09 pm
That’s more or less what I wrote in a comment at Paul Krugman’s blog. There is a credit spread component, most of the time the spread is so small that it doesn’t matter. But it matters now. And by the way NONE of that stuff, negative repo, liquidity trap, can happen with the ECB. First they have a minimum deposit rate AND they are super senior to all credits in the zone including governments which means that govvies rates and repos have a credible floor:the ECB deposit rate. One more lesson to learn, Creative Ben.
May 14th, 2008 at 8:44 am
Thanks for your reply. repo fee is a scarcity premium … Cash is scarce …. so who is delivering the cash later is paying the premium right? So it looks like you are saying with negative repo scenario bond is slightly more scarce than cash? …in case of zero people were “scarcity-neutral” ….
we dont know that we know what we dont know?