Monolines: Back to Hell

Graphs: CMA DataVision




Posted by jck at 11:09 am EST on April 23rd, 2008 |

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

5 Responses to “ Monolines: Back to Hell ”

  • # 1 MA Says:

    Charts for Dummies: Could someone explain to me how to read these charts?

  • # 2 jck Says:

    It is the annual spread in basis points that you would pay to insure $100 of debt or loan against default.
    Ex: 790 means 7.90% to insure 100 worth of debt.
    Big number is bad [and not consistent with a triple A rating I might add].
    Low number is better.
    The 2 graphs show that the monolines are worst off than earely in the year despite having raised some capital to maintain their credit rating.

  • # 3 Looks like « a neoconservative, mugged by Hobbes Says:

    [...] 23, 2008 by E. Cartman the monolines (Ambac and MBIA — remember them?) are going to be the next “crisis” … [...]

  • # 4 Aiden Says:

    The 2037 Ambac’s are trading as if they were CCC rated (or moody’s Caa3-ish), and the CDS’s are trading on an upfront basis: http://www.reuters.com/article/comktnews/idUSN2345078820080423?rpc=77
    Looks like junk to me. I wonder who has the most exposure to ABK? More capital raising to be had by all!

  • # 5 julio_lugo Says:

    A buddy of mine claims that, because of the CDS market, monoline insurance is an outdated business model, that will go the way of video rental stores. Any truth to this?

  • Leave a Reply

    contact

    jck [at]

    aleablog [dot] com


    © 2008 Alea | Powered by Wordpress


    E-mail It