Alea

Harvard kicks up the risk level a notch or two. Whom God would destroy, he often makes mad.

Perhaps a a better word for Bernanke, and Bush and Obama’s advisors, is Sophomoric. They’re bright guys, but they are thinking way too linearly about these economic problems, and their solutions, and blindly assuming that Bernanke/Friedman got it right regarding what went wrong in the Great Depression.

Exactly NOT the view supported by Bernanke, read further:
“If instead the Great Moderation was the result of structural change or improved policymaking, then the increase in stability should be more likely to persist, assuming of course that policymakers do not forget the lessons of history.
My view is that improvements in monetary policy, though certainly not the only factor, have probably been an important source of the Great Moderation. In particular, I am not convinced that the decline in macroeconomic volatility of the past two decades was primarily the result of good luck, as some have argued, though I am sure good luck had its part to play as well. In the remainder of my remarks, I will provide some support for the “improved-monetary-policy”