<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Alea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aleablog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aleablog.com</link>
	<description>Alea Jacta Est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Is From The Wall Street Journal by Andrew Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/this-is-from-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4770#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an odd way to present the information graphically and the graphs they are presenting are not representative of the numbers.  

In the Spanish debt picture, if the area represents the debt, then the 34.7B would be the area, taking the square root of that would make each side 5.89 or we could round it to 6.

The square root of 6.6B (the stress test)  is 2.5.  

So the first graph should show that the stress test covers about one-third of the area, which is doesn&#039;t.

The other graphs are similarly misleading.  To me, there are two mistakes.  They shouldn&#039;t have tried to present the picture using area in a square, the nature of square roots and area will minimize the impact, not maximize it, which presumably they are trying to do.  Secondly, the grapher should have failed geometry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an odd way to present the information graphically and the graphs they are presenting are not representative of the numbers.  </p>
<p>In the Spanish debt picture, if the area represents the debt, then the 34.7B would be the area, taking the square root of that would make each side 5.89 or we could round it to 6.</p>
<p>The square root of 6.6B (the stress test)  is 2.5.  </p>
<p>So the first graph should show that the stress test covers about one-third of the area, which is doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The other graphs are similarly misleading.  To me, there are two mistakes.  They shouldn&#8217;t have tried to present the picture using area in a square, the nature of square roots and area will minimize the impact, not maximize it, which presumably they are trying to do.  Secondly, the grapher should have failed geometry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Is From The Wall Street Journal by Richard Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/this-is-from-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-4013</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4770#comment-4013</guid>
		<description>Stunning. 

I think squaring the numbers you want to portray before you graph them should become an industry standard. It makes them even more exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stunning. </p>
<p>I think squaring the numbers you want to portray before you graph them should become an industry standard. It makes them even more exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Is From The Wall Street Journal by Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/this-is-from-the-wall-street-journal/#comment-4012</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4770#comment-4012</guid>
		<description>Not just the graph, the whole piece is recycling of old news. 
It seems nobody at WSJ is familiar with what the banks were asked to do for these stress tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just the graph, the whole piece is recycling of old news.<br />
It seems nobody at WSJ is familiar with what the banks were asked to do for these stress tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Impact of High and Growing Government Debt on Economic Growth by Carlomagno</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/impact-of-high-and-growing-government-debt-on-economic-growth/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlomagno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4746#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>Indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Impact of High and Growing Government Debt on Economic Growth by jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/impact-of-high-and-growing-government-debt-on-economic-growth/#comment-4003</link>
		<dc:creator>jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4746#comment-4003</guid>
		<description>the data set is a bit thin + the conclusion is just what the ECB wants to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the data set is a bit thin + the conclusion is just what the ECB wants to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Impact of High and Growing Government Debt on Economic Growth by Carlomagno</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/impact-of-high-and-growing-government-debt-on-economic-growth/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlomagno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 15:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4746#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>A quick perusal of Eurostat GFS tables confirms that Belgium, Greece and Italy are the only Eurozpne countries that have persistently breached the debt thresholds. Seems an awfully small sample to work with, plus there are other structural factors that coumld explain the low growth in these countries. Are the results presented in this ECB paper any more reliable that those of Reinhard and Rogoff (which are dominated by the post-WWII years in the US)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick perusal of Eurostat GFS tables confirms that Belgium, Greece and Italy are the only Eurozpne countries that have persistently breached the debt thresholds. Seems an awfully small sample to work with, plus there are other structural factors that coumld explain the low growth in these countries. Are the results presented in this ECB paper any more reliable that those of Reinhard and Rogoff (which are dominated by the post-WWII years in the US)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Paradox of Toil by jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-paradox-of-toil/#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator>jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4716#comment-3974</guid>
		<description>no idea, it is an unusual pattern...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no idea, it is an unusual pattern&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Paradox of Toil by Ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-paradox-of-toil/#comment-3973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4716#comment-3973</guid>
		<description>JCK,  I have a question related to GLD/GC options Implied Volatility. This IV rises with the farther expirations while, say for SPY is stays about the same.
For instance:

GLD August options: IV is about 18
GLD Jan&#039;11 options: IV is about 22.3
GLD Jan&#039;12 options: IV is about 27.4


SPY August options: IV is about 23
SPY Dec&#039;10 options: IV is about 25
SPY Dec&#039;11 options: IV is about 25

Any thoughts? TIA, Ilya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JCK,  I have a question related to GLD/GC options Implied Volatility. This IV rises with the farther expirations while, say for SPY is stays about the same.<br />
For instance:</p>
<p>GLD August options: IV is about 18<br />
GLD Jan&#8217;11 options: IV is about 22.3<br />
GLD Jan&#8217;12 options: IV is about 27.4</p>
<p>SPY August options: IV is about 23<br />
SPY Dec&#8217;10 options: IV is about 25<br />
SPY Dec&#8217;11 options: IV is about 25</p>
<p>Any thoughts? TIA, Ilya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Paradox of Toil by andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-paradox-of-toil/#comment-3972</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4716#comment-3972</guid>
		<description>In a non-Marxian world, Gregor&#039;s comment would read &quot;I do not like green eggs and ham&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a non-Marxian world, Gregor&#8217;s comment would read &#8220;I do not like green eggs and ham&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Paradox of Toil by David Merkel</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/the-paradox-of-toil/#comment-3971</link>
		<dc:creator>David Merkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 07:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/?p=4716#comment-3971</guid>
		<description>I commented on this paper before.  Point 3 of this piece:

http://alephblog.com/2010/03/04/notes-and-comments-2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I commented on this paper before.  Point 3 of this piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://alephblog.com/2010/03/04/notes-and-comments-2/" rel="nofollow">http://alephblog.com/2010/03/04/notes-and-comments-2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
