<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to Basics: First to Default Swap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/</link>
	<description>Alea Jacta Est</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-854</guid>
		<description>anon:
In theory, no it's not a bad thing. I doubt that the Fed mounted yet another rescue, having failed to stop the rot since last august with the intention to get yet more investment funds blow-ups. This is Bernanke, not the Mellon of "liquidate everything.." in 30s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon:<br />
In theory, no it&#8217;s not a bad thing. I doubt that the Fed mounted yet another rescue, having failed to stop the rot since last august with the intention to get yet more investment funds blow-ups. This is Bernanke, not the Mellon of &#8220;liquidate everything..&#8221; in 30s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-853</guid>
		<description>Unintended?

Is it necessariliy a bad thing if the Fed's liquidity facility helps move a bankrupt mortgage fund out of the credit logjam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unintended?</p>
<p>Is it necessariliy a bad thing if the Fed&#8217;s liquidity facility helps move a bankrupt mortgage fund out of the credit logjam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jck</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>jck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Noel:
I have the Bloomberg book as well, very good  [have loads of them..]
I follow the market pretty closely and I must say that if F2D are making a comeback it's more because of marketing than popular demand as you suggest.
You are right about the correlation modelling same problem, there is no such thing as correct mark to market with CDSs whatever the packaging. One day perhaps we will have exchange trade zero coupon CDS on indices and that would be better but won't happen any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel:<br />
I have the Bloomberg book as well, very good  [have loads of them..]<br />
I follow the market pretty closely and I must say that if F2D are making a comeback it&#8217;s more because of marketing than popular demand as you suggest.<br />
You are right about the correlation modelling same problem, there is no such thing as correct mark to market with CDSs whatever the packaging. One day perhaps we will have exchange trade zero coupon CDS on indices and that would be better but won&#8217;t happen any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noel</title>
		<link>http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aleablog.com/back-to-basics-first-to-default-swap/#comment-851</guid>
		<description>jck,

I wonder if this demand for FTDs is a marketing driven exercise. Now the banks are unable to sell tranches of CDOs they move to another structured product.
Surely it is going to suffer from some of the same problems as the ITraxx CDOs - namely correlation modelling. How do you get an accurate mark to market if you have a bespoke FTD?

Agree with the Chaplin recommendation, another good book release recently is 

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1576601870</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jck,</p>
<p>I wonder if this demand for FTDs is a marketing driven exercise. Now the banks are unable to sell tranches of CDOs they move to another structured product.<br />
Surely it is going to suffer from some of the same problems as the ITraxx CDOs - namely correlation modelling. How do you get an accurate mark to market if you have a bespoke FTD?</p>
<p>Agree with the Chaplin recommendation, another good book release recently is </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1576601870">http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1576601870</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
